Case 1600935/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Saunders v Precision Peripherals Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600935/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Saunders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the complaint of disability discrimination. It recorded that, by letter dated 6 August 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the complaint should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal said the claimant had not addressed the disability discrimination claim at all in the ET1, and that ticking the box was insufficient. It found that the claimant had failed to make written representations, or any sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out, and had not requested a hearing.
As a result, the complaint of disability discrimination was struck out. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were still listed for a preliminary hearing for case management on 15 September 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Struck out because the claimant had not addressed the disability discrimination complaint in the ET1; the tribunal said ticking the box was insufficient. A letter dated 6 August 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations were made. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.