Case 1600946/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Baker v Tough Runner UK Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600946/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Baker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 14 August 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge R Harfield determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Tough Runner UK Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss R Baker's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay her £866.25 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and employee national insurance contributions.
No separate split of the award is given beyond the single sum ordered, and the judgment records a total payment of £866.25.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21 recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay £866.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £866 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £866
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.