Case 1600948/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Storer v Cowbridge Professional Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600948/2021
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Storer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 July 2022, the Tribunal gave Miss R Storer an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order contained in the email dated 14 July 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge J Bromige therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records the date of the decision as 12 August 2022 and that the judgment was sent to the parties on 30 August 2022. No substantive remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers to 'the claim' collectively and does not separate claim heads; this claim type is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to 'the claim' collectively and does not separate claim heads; this claim type is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.