Case 1600949/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Briones Khan v Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600949/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Briones Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the proceedings under rule 52.
No substantive findings on the merits of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, or breach of contract are recorded. No remedy or monetary award is addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the listing categories, as the one-page judgment does not separately identify the pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type and protected characteristic are inferred from the listing categories, as the judgment does not separately identify the pleaded discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the listing categories, as the one-page judgment does not separately identify the pleaded claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.