Case 1600950/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mrs Long (HR) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600950/2019
- Decision date
- 12 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a concession by the respondent and declared the claimant's holiday pay entitlement pursuant to sections 11 and 12 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment found the claimant's holiday pay claim well founded.
The tribunal declared that the claimant's contractual holiday year ran from 1 January to 31 December, and that the same structure continued into 2020 unless changed by agreement. It found that during 2019 the claimant accrued 5.6 weeks' holiday under the Working Time Regulations.
The judgment further recorded that between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2020 the claimant accrued 1.54 weeks' holiday, had taken 5.3 weeks' holiday between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2020, and had 1.63 weeks' outstanding accrued holiday as at 31 March 2020. It also stated that she would continue to accrue holiday at 0.11 weeks per week of work while employed by the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The respondent made a concession. The tribunal declared the claimant's holiday pay entitlement and related holiday accrual/holiday-year dates; no monetary award was recorded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.