Case 1600951/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Samuel v David Charles Travel Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600951/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Samuel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Miss R Samuel's claim against David Charles Travel Limited was struck out. By letter dated 7 September 2023, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with Tribunal orders dated 10 May 2023, 6 June 2023 and 5 August 2023, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Brace struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any merits determination or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out after the claimant did not comply with Tribunal orders dated 10 May 2023, 6 June 2023 and 5 August 2023, and did not actively pursue the claim. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 7 September 2023 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.