Case 1600952/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Parry v Mrs Susan Kelly t/a Peninsula Property Management — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600952/2020
- Decision date
- 21 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Cawthray Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Parry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff by video on 21 June 2021 before Employment Judge G Cawthray, the respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was refused. The judgment records that the claims identified in paragraph 56(a) of the Case Management Summary dated 2 September 2020 were to continue.
The claimant's application to amend the claim to add a claim under regulation 11 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, relating to holding a duty phone on a rota system, was also refused. This was an interlocutory decision only; the written record does not determine liability and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's strike out application under Rule 37 was refused, and the claims identified in paragraph 56(a) of the Case Management Summary dated 2 September 2020 were left to continue. This judgment did not determine liability or award any remedy. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.