Case 1600952/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McCormick v I4 Technology Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600952/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mason Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P McCormick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Mason Date found that I4 Technology Group Ltd was in breach of contract because it dismissed Mr P McCormick without notice. The tribunal awarded him £5,810.83 in damages for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £6,547.51 in respect of that claim.
The judgment is short and does not set out any additional factual findings or legal analysis beyond those conclusions and awards. The decision was sent to the parties on 6 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the claimant without notice. | Upheld | — | £5,811 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £6,548 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,358
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.