Case 1600953/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Mankau, Counsel v Ms Natalie Tossell t/a Nanny Nats Childcare — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600953/2021
- Decision date
- 2 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Mason Representation
- Venue
- Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Mankau, Counsel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Ms Natalie Tossell t/a Nanny Nats Childcare had made an unlawful deduction from the claimants’ wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The decision was announced orally at the hearing and recorded in the written judgment dated 1 September 2022.
The judgment does not set out detailed reasons in writing. It records only the tribunal’s liability finding and states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record.
Remedy was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that remedy was to be either agreed by the parties or decided at a hearing listed for 10 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimants’ wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Remedy was not decided in this judgment and was left to be agreed between the parties or determined at a further hearing listed for 10 November 2022. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.