Case 1600957/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jordan Williams v Lizard Workwear and Safety Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) Heard by: CVP link — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600957/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jordan Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 remedy judgment dated 13 July 2020, before Employment Judge A Frazer, with the claimant appearing in person and no appearance by the respondent. The tribunal recorded that Mr Jordan Williams was entitled to a redundancy payment of £960, a guarantee payment of £145, notice pay of £1,280, holiday pay of £1,024 and unpaid wages of £2,772.
The extracted text contains the remedy award only and does not set out further liability reasoning or separate findings beyond the amounts awarded. The total recorded award was £6,181.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded in the rule 21 remedy judgment. | Upheld | — | £960 |
| Other | Guarantee payment awarded; this is not a separate enum category in the extraction schema. | Upheld | — | £145 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,280 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,024 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages awarded. | Upheld | — | £2,772 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,181
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.