Case 1600961/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Chaloner v Clinton James Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600961/2024
- Decision date
- 20 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Chaloner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 12 August 2024, held at Cardiff by CVP, Employment Judge Leith found that Ms E Chaloner was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment against Clinton James Ltd. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,835, stating that the figure was based on 5 years' completed service, the claimant being 51 years old at the effective date of termination, and a weekly pay of £378.
The complaint of breach of contract was dismissed because it was brought outside the relevant time limit. The written record notes that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and does not record any further substantive reasons or any other monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,835, calculated by reference to 5 years' completed service, age 51 at the effective date of termination, and weekly pay of £378. | Upheld | — | £2,835 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the complaint was brought outside the relevant time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,835
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.