Case 1600963/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Grabham v Bombora Wave Power Europe Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600963/2023
- Decision date
- 6 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Grabham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record states that the respondent's name was changed to Bombora Wave Power Europe Ltd. The hearing took place at Cardiff on 4 December 2023 before Employment Judge C Sharp sitting alone, with the claimant in person and the respondent represented by Mr S Leighton.
The tribunal recorded that the claims were dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The judgment does not contain any findings on the substance of the pleaded claims and does not record any liability conclusions on the underlying allegations.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 due to the non-attendance of the Claimant; no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 due to the non-attendance of the Claimant; no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 due to the non-attendance of the Claimant; no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 due to the non-attendance of the Claimant; no merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.