Case 1600967/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J W Nowicki v Natural Gas Installations Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600967/2022
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J W Nowicki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim against Natural Gas Installations Ltd. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The Tribunal also noted that on 11 January 2024 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, the Tribunal stated that the claim was struck out. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying substantive complaint and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out. The Tribunal said the respondent company had been dissolved, the claimant had not applied to restore it to the Register of Companies, and the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.