Case 1600973/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Parry v [R2] Claire White T/a Ysgol Bryn Garth After School Club Date: 24 August 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600973/2020
- Decision date
- 20 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Parry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Parry brought a claim against Claire White t/a Ysgol Bryn Garth After School Club. The tribunal recorded that no ET3 response form had been presented by the second respondent, but that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to determine the matter properly.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unlawful deduction of wages and awarded £1,520.40. It also stated that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal decided the claim in the absence of an ET3 response form from the second respondent and under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Upheld | — | £1,520 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,520
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.