Case 1600976/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Donaldson v Seiont Manor Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600976/2020
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Donaldson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in the claim by Mr C Donaldson against Seiont Manor Limited. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,651.19.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,477.80. The judgment records no separate award for interest, injury to feelings, basic award, or compensatory award, and the two recorded monetary awards total £3,128.99.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the deduction as an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,651 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,478 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,129
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.