Case 1600980/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Balmont (C1) and Claimants 2-11 v Flogas Britain Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600980/2024
- Decision date
- 27 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Swansea
- Panel members
- Mrs A Burge, Mrs J Keene
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Balmont (C1) and Claimants 2-11
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard claims brought by Mr S Balmont and other claimants against Flogas Britain Limited at Swansea on 27 June 2025. The panel consisted of Employment Judge H J Randall, Mrs A Burge, and Mrs J Keene.
The unanimous judgment recorded that the complaint under s.145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, concerning inducements relating to collective bargaining, was not well-founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the provided judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The judgment states that the complaint under s.145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for inducements relating to collective bargaining was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not included in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.