Case 1600982/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S C Pritchard v Fieldbay (2019) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600982/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S C Pritchard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 15 December 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 28 to 30 March 2022 will not take place. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not set out the underlying unfair dismissal allegations. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not set out the underlying disability discrimination allegations. It records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.