Case 1600983/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Saunders v Home Office — 2026
- Case reference
- 1600983/2026
- Decision date
- 21 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Williams REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Saunders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss R Saunders's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims against the Home Office were dismissed following her non-attendance at the Cardiff hearing on 21 August 2026. The public preliminary hearing had been listed to decide whether the claims, which had been brought out of time, should be permitted to proceed. Her employment ended in May 2025, and the claim had been ongoing since April 2026.
At 09.49am, 11 minutes before the hearing was due to start, Saunders requested a postponement by email, saying that her mental health made her unfit to attend. She also referred to being unable to secure legal representation. The tribunal found that she had supplied no supporting evidence, including medical evidence. She had not provided the witness statement or evidence about time limits required by the notice issued on 17 July 2026, and had not answered the respondent's emails of 6 and 14 August. Her claim form referred to poor health and poor mental health but did not specify the disability relied upon.
The tribunal refused the postponement under Rule 32(2)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because there was insufficient evidence of exceptional circumstances to justify an application made less than seven days before the hearing. In particular, there was no medical evidence of a long-term illness or disability preventing engagement with the proceedings or attendance. Taking account of the available information and the claimant's failure to attend or be represented, the tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 47. It did not decide their substantive merits or whether to permit them to proceed out of time. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or have representation at the hearing. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits or whether the claim should be permitted to proceed out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or have representation at the hearing. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits or whether the claim should be permitted to proceed out of time. The claim form did not specify the alleged disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 32(2)(c), Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: exceptional circumstances for postponement on an application made less than seven days before the hearing
- Rule 47, Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024: dismissal following non-attendance
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.