Case 1601002/2023 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Mr and Mrs Phillips T/a Penllain Garage — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601002/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent's name to Moira & Kevin Phillips trading as Penllain Garage. The respondent did not attend, and the claimant appeared in person. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was made out. The tribunal calculated wages due as £3,298.38 less £3,188.83, resulting in £104.55.
The complaint of unpaid holiday pay was also made out. The tribunal found that one week's accrued holiday pay was due at £642.68. It ordered the respondent to pay £747.23 in total and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on the salary and holiday pay payments made to the claimant. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded; the tribunal calculated wages due as £3,298.38 minus £3,188.83. | Upheld | — | £105 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay succeeded; the tribunal awarded accrued holiday pay for 1 week at £642.68. | Upheld | — | £643 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £747
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.