Case 1601013/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J E Roberts v Celtic Cleaning Services Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601013/2024
- Decision date
- 18 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J E Roberts
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Wrexham by CVP before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan on 29 November 2024, dealt with the claim in the Respondent's absence and with no response entered. It found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant accrued holiday pay due on termination of employment. The tribunal accepted that the relevant period was 1 January 2023 to 25 August 2023, during which 13 days of holiday had accrued but not been taken, and that the daily gross rate was £84.
On that basis, the tribunal awarded holiday pay of £1,092, subject to the usual statutory deductions. It also found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with written employment particulars and awarded two weeks' net pay totalling £660 for that failure. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, and no such request was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay on termination for the period 1 January 2023 to 25 August 2023; 13 days accrued but untaken holidays at a daily gross rate of £84. | Upheld | — | £1,092 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to provide written employment particulars; tribunal awarded two weeks' net pay in respect of this failure. | Upheld | — | £660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,752
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.