Case 1601016/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Walters v Melin Homes Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601016/2021
- Decision date
- 23 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Walters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr R Walters' claim against Melin Homes Ltd because it had not been actively pursued. On 1 February 2022 the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. The hearing listed for 10 and 11 March 2022 did not take place. The judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 1 February 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but he failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.