Case 1601021/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Paynter v Bio Equipment Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601021/2019
- Decision date
- 3 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Representation
- Venue
- Swansea
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Paynter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Paynter brought a claim for unpaid wages following unlawful deductions against Bio Equipment Limited. After hearing evidence from both sides and considering the bundle, Employment Judge Howden-Evans found the claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £1,781.52.
The judgment records that Mr Reilly, for Bio Equipment Limited, confirmed the debt would be cleared in full by posting a cheque to the claimant on or before 31 October 2019. The tribunal also stated that if the debt was not paid by that date, interest would accrue at 8% per annum on any unpaid balance under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unpaid wages following unlawful deductions well-founded and ordered payment of £1,781.52. The judgment also recorded that the respondent said it would clear the debt by cheque on or before 31 October 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,782 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,782
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.