Case 1601023/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Griffiths v The Body Shop International Limited c/o Frp Advisory Trading Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1601023/2024
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Griffiths
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 27 February 2025, the tribunal gave Mrs M Griffiths an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge C Sharp struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any determination of the substantive merits of the underlying case, and it does not identify any monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s). On 27 February 2025 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. No sufficient representations or hearing request was made, and the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.