Case 1601044/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Carers Trust South East Wales — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601044/2017
- Decision date
- 3 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Cardiff on 23 May 2019 before Employment Judge Moore, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's unfair dismissal claim framed as an allegation that he was dismissed for asserting a statutory right under s.104 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal struck that claim out because it had no reasonable prospects of success.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims were allowed to proceed to hearing. No monetary award was made at this stage, and the decision does not record any split of remedy between claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was described as unfair dismissal for asserting a statutory right contrary to s.104 Employment Rights Act 1996. It was struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.104 Employment Rights Act 1996
- no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.