Case 1601047/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Squillace v Denny’s Magic Diners UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601047/2020
- Decision date
- 18 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vernon Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Squillace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in which Miss G Squillace and Denny’s Magic Diners UK Ltd agreed that judgment should be entered for an admitted sum. The tribunal recorded that the sum was £1,355.44 and that it was payable in respect of claims of breach of contract, unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
The judgment also records that the respondent had entered into a Company Voluntary Arrangement which included the sum owed to the claimant. No written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days, and the judgment contains no findings on liability beyond the parties' agreement to the monetary sum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment entered for an admitted sum; reasons were not provided. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment entered for an admitted sum; reasons were not provided. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Consent judgment entered for an admitted sum; reasons were not provided. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,355
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.