Case 1601058/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Thomas v EE Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1601058/2026
- Decision date
- 18 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brady Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in Cardiff on 18 August 2026, Employment Judge W Brady allowed EE Ltd's application to strike out Miss E Thomas's claims under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The claims were struck out and dismissed under Rule 38(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospects of success.
Full reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not identify the individual causes of action or set out the facts supporting the strike-out decision. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers collectively to the claimant's claims without identifying their number or causes of action. They are represented together here. The disability discrimination listing category cannot be verified from the judgment text. The claims were expressly struck out and dismissed under Rule 38(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure: no reasonable prospects of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.