Case 1601062/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Health v Visual Metrics Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601062/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Health
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Jenkins dealt with the case under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented an ET3 response form. The judge said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to determine the claim and upheld the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages.
The written judgment records an award of £3,192.00 gross for unpaid wages. It also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. No separate holiday-pay figure is set out in the extracted judgment text, so the only monetary award that can be identified with confidence is the unpaid wages sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment expressly lists 'Unpaid wages (gross): £3,192.00'. It also contains a standard tax/NIC sentence referring to 'unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay', but no separate holiday-pay sum is listed in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £3,192 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.