Case 1601062/2021 · Employment Tribunal
IN PERSON FOR THE v Miss Quenby — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601062/2021
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
IN PERSON FOR THE
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely on 24 March 2022 by Employment Judge McLeese sitting alone. The tribunal held that the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim against Rybond Couriers Limited was well founded and upheld it.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,569.89. The award was calculated as £1,109.89 for deductions made for damage to the van and £460.00 for wages for a notice period not worked. The extracted judgment does not record any other claim, any split award beyond those two elements, or any legal test expressly cited in the reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,569.89, made up of £1,109.89 for deductions made for damage to the van and £460.00 for wages for a notice period not worked. | Upheld | — | £1,570 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,570
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.