Case 1601063/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Hover v Visual Metrics Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601063/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Hover
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Jenkins determined the claim under Rule 21 in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent, Visual Metrics Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation). The judgment states there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid wages and awarded £3,256.00 gross. The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, but it does not record any separate holiday-pay award in the operative part of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment upholds unpaid wages (gross) of £3,256.00. It does not set out any separate split between wage and holiday-pay elements in the award. | Upheld | — | £3,256 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,256
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.