Case 1601067/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Schwartz v Quadratec Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601067/2024
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Schwartz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 24 April 2024 and 01 July 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £7,520.96 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £310.80.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £7,831.76 in total, with the claimant responsible for any tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; figure is gross. | Upheld | — | £7,521 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,832
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.