Case 1601078/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Irwin v Healthcare Assistants Limited and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601078/2018
- Decision date
- 17 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RL Brace
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs D Irwin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge RL Brace entered judgment in default against the First Respondent, Healthcare Assistants Limited, because it had failed to file a response. The judgment records that this was in favour of the Claimant, Mrs D Irwin, in respect of liability. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
The claim against the Second Respondent, Willowmere Home Care Agency Limited, was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not record any further findings, remedy calculation, or legal test beyond those dispositional orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment entered against the First Respondent in favour of the Claimant on liability. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against the Second Respondent was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.