Case 1601079/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Gonorashe & Miss Ricci v Editorial Staff Services Ltd (In compulsory Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601079/2018
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Gonorashe & Miss Ricci
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in the linked cases 1601079/2018, 1601167/2018 and 1601221/2018 against Editorial Staff Services Ltd (in compulsory liquidation). On 18 February 2021 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim in terms, but the GOV.UK listing for this case classifies it as unlawful deduction from wages. The Tribunal struck the claim out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing after the letter dated 18 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.