Case 1601095/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Atkinson v Leah Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601095/2020
- Decision date
- 10 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Atkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Jenkins determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because no ET3 response form had been presented by Leah Ltd and there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. The judgment records that the claimant was Ms L Atkinson and that the respondent was Leah Ltd.
The tribunal upheld claims for unlawful deduction of wages, breach of contract, and holiday pay. The amounts awarded were £20.82 for unlawful deduction of wages, £173.16 for breach of contract, and £149.18 for holiday pay, making a total award of £343.16.
The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £21 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £173 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £149 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £343
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.