Case 1601096/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Brown v Spectrum Healthcare Domiciliary Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601096/2021
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Macdonald Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Brown
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Brown's claim for compensation related to entitlement to leave under Regulations 13, 13A, 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. The judgment records that the respondent, Spectrum Healthcare Domiciliary Care Limited, was ordered to pay £3,171.01 in respect of holiday pay.
The tribunal also made an additional award of £954 pursuant to s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, described as a sum equivalent to two weeks' pay. The total ordered to be paid to the claimant was £4,125.01.
The written record is brief and does not set out detailed reasons, but it notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing. No discrimination, dismissal, or other separate claim is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claim for compensation related to entitlement to leave pursuant to Regulations 13, 13A, 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. The tribunal ordered £3,171.01 in respect of holiday pay and a further £954 pursuant to s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £4,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,125
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £954
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,171
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulations 13, 13A, 14 & 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.