Case 1601103/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A J Stacey v B&W Builders & Decorators Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601103/2021
- Decision date
- 20 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A J Stacey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 April 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with Tribunal orders and had not actively pursued the case.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge S Davies struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 4 July 2022 to 7 July 2022 was cancelled as a result of the strike out. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 4 April 2022 letter. No individual substantive claims are identified in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.