Case 1601108/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Lloyd v Connah’s Quay Town Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601108/2022
- Decision date
- 27 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Lloyd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote hearing on 26 June 2023, Employment Judge S Moore dealt with a preliminary issue in Ms K Lloyd's claims against Connah's Quay Town Council. The tribunal held that Ms Lloyd did not have sufficient continuity of service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment records that the automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 continued and would be listed for a full hearing. No final findings were made in this judgment on that claim, and no monetary remedy was assessed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant did not have sufficient continuity of service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 was said to continue and to be listed for a full hearing; it was not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.