Case 1601111/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Rees v The Vale of Glamorgan Council (2R) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601111/2018
- Decision date
- 26 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Rees
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Rees brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against the Vale of Glamorgan Council. The judgment record states that the hearing took place at Cardiff on 21, 22, 23 and 24 October 2019 before Employment Judge Harfield sitting alone, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons are not provided unless requested in accordance with Rule 62(3).
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy figures are given. The only recorded outcome is dismissal of the unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.