Case 1601118/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Cullis v Wakeup Bristol Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601118/2023
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Cullis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 6 June 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that Wakeup Bristol Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr J Cullis's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,277.66. The judgment does not break that figure down into separate heads of loss or refer to any additional remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the claim was determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Upheld | — | £3,278 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,278
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.