Case 1601118/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Williams v Merthyr Tydfil Leisure Trust Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation), and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1601118/2024
- Decision date
- 30 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr G Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Wales Employment Tribunal on 24 April 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On the substance of the claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,472.49 gross, and recorded that the total amount payable to the claimant was £1,472.49.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due. No separate split of the award is given beyond the single wages deduction figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The judgment records the award as £1,472.49 gross, with the same amount payable in total. | Upheld | — | £1,472 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,472
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.