Case 1601138/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The V Evans Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601138/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment, not a merits decision on the underlying claim. By a letter order dated 7 October 2020, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 7 October 2020 and had not actively pursued the case.
The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore struck out the response. The judgment records that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
No remedy was assessed and no substantive liability finding was made on the employment claim itself in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 37 strike-out of the respondent's response. It does not determine the underlying claim on the merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.