Case 1601140/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Thomas v WDL (Concrete Products) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601140/2020
- Decision date
- 18 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Richard Thomas brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against WDL (Concrete Products) Ltd. The case was heard remotely by video with the parties' consent at Cardiff on 14-16 December 2020 before Employment Judge R Brace.
The written record states that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. It also states that the claim for wrongful dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. No written reasons are included in the judgment document itself; it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No remedy award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate monetary figures are identified in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.