Case 1601147/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Guy v Highland Medical Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601147/2017
- Decision date
- 23 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Guy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a remedy judgment in an unfair dismissal case brought by Mr T Guy against Highland Medical Limited. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £734 after applying a 25% reduction for contributory fault to a gross basic award of £978. It also awarded notice pay of £7,000, having recalculated the notice element as three months' net monthly pay of £3,143 less £2,429 received in income between August and November 2017.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy judgment only. The tribunal awarded a basic award, notice pay, and a compensatory award, producing a total award of £24,749. | Upheld | — | £24,749 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,749
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £734
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,015
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Digital Equipment Co Ltd v Clements (No.2)
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services
- contributory fault reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.