Case 1601152/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Anna Dardis v Pembrokeshire County Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601152/2024
- Decision date
- 28 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Othen Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Anna Dardis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing heard by CVP on 25 October 2024, Employment Judge Othen considered Miss Anna Dardis's disability discrimination claim against Pembrokeshire County Council. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Evans, Chief HR Officer.
The tribunal held that the claim, brought under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010, was not presented within the applicable time limit. It further found that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The claim was therefore dismissed.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal decided at a public preliminary hearing that the section 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 disability discrimination claim was out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.