Case 1601156/2022 · Employment Tribunal
L Thomas Evans v MB Fitness Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601156/2022
- Decision date
- 19 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Thomas Evans
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It found that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also recorded that on 17 January 2024 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No merits determination or remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was struck out. It does not identify the underlying pleaded claim types in the text provided; the strike out was ordered because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and the required permission of the court had not been obtained, and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after the tribunal invited written reasons for non-active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.