Case 1601157/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. C. Morris v Prime Care Services Ltd. HELD BY: CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1601157/2021
- Decision date
- 12 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. C. Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 4 January 2022 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, the tribunal considered Mr C. Morris’s claim against Prime Care Services Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by Mr M. Howson, Senior Litigation Consultant.
The tribunal found that the respondent had not made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in respect of holiday pay totalling £489.48. The amount related to days’ leave taken in excess of accrued holidays as at the effective date of termination of employment. The claim therefore failed and was dismissed.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The decision was sent to the parties on 12 January 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent did not make unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in respect of holiday pay totalling £489.48 for days’ leave taken in excess of accrued holidays as at the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.