Case 1601164/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Dr G Jones v Development Bank of Wales HELD AT: Wrexham (by CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1601164/2024
- Decision date
- 1 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr G Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a reserved preliminary hearing, the tribunal considered only whether Dr G Jones was a disabled person during his employment with Development Bank of Wales between 3 January 2023 and 29 November 2023. The judge applied section 6 Equality Act 2010 and addressed whether there was an impairment, whether it had an adverse effect on day-to-day activities, whether that effect was substantial, and whether it was long-term or likely to be long-term. The tribunal also considered the parties' submissions on deduced effect where medication was involved.
The tribunal found that from July 2023 throughout the employment Dr Jones had persistent throbbing pain in his left leg, arising in the context of DVT and later related diagnoses. It accepted that the pain affected his ability to sit, stand and walk for extended periods, interfered with desk work and travel, and led him to change posture and activity frequently. The judge found that painkillers and blood thinners ameliorated the symptoms but did not end them, and that the condition had a substantial adverse effect on day-to-day activities.
The respondent challenged the medical evidence and the claimant's credibility, including matters arising from covert recordings and the claimant's evidence under cross-examination. The tribunal did not accept that he was exaggerating his symptoms. It held that the pain was likely to continue beyond 12 months, and that the claimant had proved on the balance of probabilities that he was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time, from 3 January 2023 to 29 November 2023. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- deduced effect
- substantial adverse effect
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.