Case 1601172/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Shannon Richards v Creative Hospitality Group — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601172/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HV Dieu
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Shannon Richards
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cardiff by CVP on 31 March 2023 before Employment Judge H V Dieu sitting alone. The Claimant, Miss Shannon Richards, appeared in person and the Respondent, Creative Hospitality Group, was represented by Miss Rosalia Harley, HR Manager.
The written judgment records that the Claimant's breach of contract claim relating to non-payment of wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. Her claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay was also dismissed upon withdrawal. The Respondent's contract claim was likewise dismissed upon withdrawal.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy are set out in the written record, and the note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment therefore records the withdrawal-based disposal of each claim only, with no monetary award made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claimant's claim for breach of contract in relation to non-payment of wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claimant's claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Respondent's contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.