Case 1601177/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Cockerell v UK Windows & Doors Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1601177/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Cockerell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R Harfield, sitting at Cardiff on 13 and 14 November 2023, found that Mr R Cockerell had been unfairly dismissed by UK Windows & Doors Group Limited (in Administration). The respondent did not attend the hearing, having given prior notice through the administrators. The tribunal held that the dismissal was unfair and that the complaint was well-founded.
On remedy, the tribunal found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and increased the compensatory award by 10% under s 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It also found that the claimant had caused or contributed to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct, reducing the compensatory award by 10%, and reduced the basic award by 10% because of conduct before dismissal.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £10,416.60 after the contributory deduction and a compensatory award of £14,100.48. It set out the first loss period as notice-period loss of £9,622.68, calculated from gross taxable post-employment notice pay of £809.99 per week, with a 10% ACAS uplift and then a 10% reduction for contribution. It assessed post-notice losses to 2 October 2023 at £4,477.80 after net loss of £14,431.20, mitigation earnings of £9,908.16, a 10% uplift and a 10% deduction for contribution.
The written judgment records that an oral figure of £7,716.00 had been approved for the notice-period element, but the tribunal reconsidered and varied it under Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure because the original figure had been based on an incorrect gross weekly pay figure. The tribunal also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied because the claimant was not in receipt of benefits in the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded. It also gave the claimant 21 days to apply in writing for permission to amend to add a wrongful dismissal complaint, but that was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £24,517 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,517
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £10,417
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £14,100
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Rule 70 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.