Case 1601201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v R Newman - HM Inspector Of Health and Safety for The Health and Safety Executive — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601201/2023
- Decision date
- 16 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an appeal by APMS Builders Ltd against Improvement Notice Serial Number IN/RN/020623/ABL-01. At a hearing in Cardiff on 15 February 2024 before Employment Judge C Sharp, the tribunal recorded a consent judgment cancelling the notice under section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
The written record does not set out any disputed findings of fact or legal reasoning beyond the cancellation order itself. It also records that the judgment was given orally at the hearing, so written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal note.
No monetary award was made or recorded, and the judgment does not identify any separate remedy beyond cancellation of the notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Appeal/cancellation of an Improvement Notice under section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The tribunal recorded that, by consent, the Improvement Notice Serial Number IN/RN/020623/ABL-01 was cancelled. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 24(2) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.