Case 1601203/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lewis v Haulfryn Richard Davies Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1601203/2023
- Decision date
- 22 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Pontypridd County Court
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Haulfryn Richard Davies Ltd made an unauthorised deduction from wages when it failed to pay the claimant the holiday pay due on or about 23 April 2025. It ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, 1200.00.
On the dismissal claim, the tribunal found that the respondent's non-payment of due wages and failure to roster the claimant for further duties constituted termination of the contract without notice under section 95(1)(a) ERA 1996 on 25 April 2025. The claimant had no intention of ending the employment, and the respondent did not show a potentially fair reason under section 98 ERA 1996, so the dismissal was unfair.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of 1255.59 and a compensatory award of 2407.06, made up of 637.06 for losses in the two-week notice period, 1520.00 for four weeks' net loss of earnings after that, and 250.00 for loss of statutory rights. It also found that the claimant had 276 hours of accrued but untaken paid annual leave at the effective date of termination, valued at 3256.80 net, less 430.70 already paid, leaving 2826.10 payable. It recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply because the claimant was not in receipt of benefits in the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and awarded the gross sum deducted, being unpaid holiday pay due on or about 23 April 2025. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(a) ERA 1996 and awarded a basic award of 1255.59 and a compensatory award of 2407.06. | Upheld | — | £3,663 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal awarded compensation for accrued but untaken paid annual leave entitlement on termination, net of 430.70 already received. | Upheld | — | £2,826 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,689
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,256
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,407
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 95(1)(a) ERA 1996
- section 98 ERA 1996
- section 86(1)(b) ERA 1996
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.